Your Best Salespeople Are Watching What You Tolerate

Sales managers usually think about poor performance as an issue between the manager and the salesperson who is struggling. Is the person getting enough coaching? Were the expectations clear? Does the rep need more time? Is there something about the territory, product, or process that is contributing to the problem?

Those are fair questions. Managers should ask them before deciding someone cannot do the job.

The mistake is assuming the rest of the team is not part of that decision.

Strong salespeople usually know exactly who is producing, who is working, who needs constant help, and who always seems to have a reason for missing the number. They see which accounts get rescued. They know who follows the process and who does not. They notice when the same performance problem keeps coming back month after month.

If nothing changes, they notice that too.

Clear Expectations Have to Mean Something

SalesFirst puts a lot of emphasis on clear expectations and constructive coaching. People should know what is expected of them, and managers should look at their own training, communication, and support when someone is struggling rather than immediately assuming the employee is the problem.

That only works if the expectations eventually mean something.

A salesperson can miss a month and still be a very good salesperson. Sales is uneven. Territories are different. Deals slip. New reps need time. Sometimes the manager really does need to improve the training or rethink the expectations.

There is still a difference between working through a rough stretch and allowing chronic underperformance to become normal.

Most teams can see the difference. They know the rep who misses a number, owns it, changes something, and starts moving in the right direction. They also know the rep who misses, blames the leads, pricing, territory, product, or market, and comes back the next month with the same explanation.

SalesFirst looks closely at accountability when evaluating salespeople because the response to poor performance can be as useful as the performance itself.

Managers should be willing to make that distinction too.

Managers Often Wait Too Long

Most managers do not lower standards on purpose. It happens one reasonable decision at a time.

The rep gets another month because there are a couple of promising deals in the pipeline. Then one slips. The manager gives them more coaching. There is a territory issue that seems legitimate. Another month passes.

Any one of those decisions may be reasonable.

The problem is that managers can keep renewing the exception long after the rest of the team has figured out the person probably is not going to make it.

At that point, the cost is no longer limited to one weak performer. The manager is spending time on the same issue over and over. Other people are compensating for the gap. Opportunities may be getting redistributed. Processes may be enforced differently depending on who is involved.

And the strongest people on the team are learning what the real standard is.

This is where managers sometimes confuse patience with fairness.

There should be patience. There should also be a point where the manager says, "We have enough information."

If the expectations were clear, the coaching was real, the support was there, and the same problems continue, another ninety days may not be development. It may just be postponing a decision.

The Best Reps Notice Where the Manager Spends Time

Strong salespeople are often easier to manage.

They do not need constant reminders. They recover from problems. They ask for help when they need it. Because they are dependable, the manager can leave them alone for longer stretches.

That is useful until being dependable becomes the reason they get less of the manager.

A manager only has so much time. Hours spent repeatedly trying to get one person to meet basic expectations are hours not spent helping a strong rep work through a large opportunity, developing someone who is ready for more responsibility, or improving the team around people who are already producing.

Some extra attention for a struggling salesperson is part of the job. Not every difficult rep should be managed off the team immediately. But managers can become so focused on saving the weakest person that they stop noticing what they are withholding from everyone else.

Top performers see that.

They may not complain about it. In many cases they will simply keep producing.

That does not mean they are not paying attention.

Standards Are Part of Retention

Sales leaders usually think about retention in terms of compensation, career growth, leadership, flexibility, or territory.

The quality of the team matters too.

Strong performers generally want to work in an environment where performance is taken seriously. That does not mean creating fear every time somebody misses a month. People who are meeting expectations should have stability, and managers should not turn every short-term setback into a job-security problem.

But stability for people meeting the standard is different from endless patience for people who consistently do not.

That second version eventually changes the team.

If one person can repeatedly miss expectations without much consequence, the standard starts to feel negotiable. If someone else has to keep picking up the slack, the standard starts to feel unfair.

Good salespeople do not need a perfect environment. Most of them can tolerate a lot.

They do need to believe that management can tell the difference between somebody having a bad month and somebody who is simply not doing the job.

Managers Have to Make the Call

There should be some discomfort in deciding that a salesperson is not going to make it. Hiring somebody is an investment, and managers should not treat people as disposable because the first few months were difficult.

Clear expectations matter. Coaching matters. Honest feedback matters. Enough time to evaluate the person matters.

But eventually the manager has to make a decision.

Waiting longer does not automatically make the decision more compassionate.

In some cases, it simply asks the rest of the team to keep pretending they do not see what is already obvious.

That is the part managers underestimate.

Your strongest salespeople are not only watching how you coach the person who is struggling.

They are watching what you tolerate.

Next
Next

15 Unique Interview Questions to Ask Your Next Sales Hire